- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 So let’s see, can technology replace teacher? or not?
Of course, the advancement of science and technology is admirable. They are offering the best services to us. We can know the unknown and see the unseen.
In fact, technology is like a teacher. Wait a minute! If technology takes the role, what will the real-life teachers do? Are we going to lose them?
Well, the answer is not simple. The teachers will sustain. At the same time, they have to be efficient enough to deal with technology.
This is not pointing that they will have to battle with technical issues. No doubts that technology made our life much better and more relaxed.
But we cannot also deny the roles of teachers as well. With a significant expansion, technology is expanding its base. The classrooms are now more interactive than before.
The teachers are using technological devices to improve students’ experience. So, we also cannot ignore the role of technology in education.
Trouble occurs when there is conflict – will technology replace teachers or not. This is a highly debating issue indeed. Many of the parents and students are unaware of it.
Even, the teachers also do not have an idea of how technology is changing around. Luckily, some of them have adapted with the newer forms of technology.
Some others are adopting. So, chances are few on that question that, can technology replace teachers?
The remaining part of the blog will describe how this is not possible for technology to replace teachers.
So let’s see, can technology replace teacher? or not?
So, here are some points that’ll give this controversy a conclusion!
Interaction with students, parents
Communication is one of the critical reasons why technology will not replace teachers. In the present days, teachers have regular interaction with students.
They take the right care of the students. The teachers assign home works, collect the copies and check them. As a result, they need to talk to the students.
Sometimes, they also have to meet the parents too. So, this appears a close interaction. When they find something fishy, they inform their parents.
This also results in deep communication with the parents. Thus, the teachers have a close connection with students and parents.
But if they would rely on technology, the situations would have been dissimilar. The application of technology reduces the interaction.
If the teachers only assign home works, and they do not check manually, the interaction reduces. When the students send the answers through online method, chances are high not to review them.
The teachers may skip the answer scripts. They may provide an average rating to the students. Actually, the application of technology creates a communication gap.
So, when teachers rely entirely on technology, they will experience the difference. Therefore, they do not follow the system all the time.
A teacher is always responsible for giving knowledge. Usually, the teachers play their role. Of course, we have software to do the job. But using software may not teach the students.
While imparting knowledge, a teacher takes the lead role. S/ he acts like an actor speaks and make the topics clearer to students. Do you think this is possible for software? The answer is merely a big ‘NO.’ The software is a tailored product.
It cannot teach the way a teacher can. The software comes with different types of information. The information is great to learn.
But what if a student does not get into the core of the information?
Here is the necessity of a teacher. The teacher can explain matters to the students. On the flip part, software is unable to do that. Generally, software is made to deliver any specific content. It is unable to explain the topic in a real-time context.
You may get diversified information over any issues. The information may also be authentic. But the software is unable to explain in detail as a teacher.
So, whatever you do to pass the exam, you will not get the learning. The software is unable to impart knowledge.
Software for certain needs
The software manufacturers make programs to meet specific needs. They develop software to solve different problems. If you want to run a school automatically, this is not possible through the software.
But you can perform specific tasks. The tasks may include accounting information, database creation or sending automatic emails. However, if you want the software to teach the students, it is entirely impossible.
You have to hire a teacher for that purpose. As a matter of fact, technology has reduced the human efforts. It is saving time for humans. Besides, there are specific other positives aspects. But you cannot depend on software to teach.
Teaching is a different procedure. It always requires a teacher to disseminate knowledge. The teacher can comprehend the situations.
Accordingly, the teacher will share the experience. S/ he will describe the events. But if you expect your accounting software to that, you are wrong. The software may count the bills flawlessly. It may sum up a large number of accounts.
But assuming it to teach students will result in vain. The software is not the teacher. So, those who say that technology will replace the teacher are wrong too.
Teachers always teach following some natural ways. This is important while teaching. If you cannot support the natural methods, you cannot share the knowledge. The software is a type of program. It cannot do except following the codes. This is not a fault.
Instead, this is a technological glitch. This is never possible to make it correct. The software will not teach naturally. For instance, the technology is on the role of a teacher. A student may need further explanation.
Is this possible for the technology to follow the natural functions? The answer is – never. It will not be able to teach like a real-life teacher.
A real-life teacher can take different roles while teaching. The role-play is a natural process of teaching. The teacher will answer the questions from the students.
They will reply using their logic. Besides, they may also cite references. As a result, there will be better communication with the students.
On the other side, other than some preset queries, software is unable to satisfy the students. This is another proof that how technology lacks the quality of a real teacher.
The natural process of learning gets an obstruction. Besides, the students may also feel uninterested with software. They may not feel comfortable when they will not get all the answers.
Technology – an aid only
Living in this modern age may make us worried about different issues. The worries are real most of the times. If someone relies most on technology, this would be foolish. Believe it or not, technology is merely a tool. It comes to help the teachers.
With the advancement of science, you can use the technology in modern classrooms. Earlier, people used to read books. But now they can attend the class without books.
E-books have replaced the original books. A student does not always need to carry the books at school. Of course, this is a positive impact of technology on education.
A teacher imparts the lessons among the students using technology. The application of multimedia classrooms is the best example.
Using a multimedia class, the teacher easily can teach. Earlier, the teacher had to bring notes, copies and other educational materials. But the ages are over now. They (the teachers) can now share the educational materials in soft forms.
This is one of the benefits of technology in the field of education. The process has become more comfortable too.
The students do not need to feel worried if they miss any class or lecture. They can get the soft copy form the fellow students. Technology has made the process easier for them.
If you want to study at home, you can do that quickly now. Therefore, it appears that technology is an aid for the teachers.
Technology has increased the expertise of both teachers and students. Now the teachers can teach easily. The students can also attend the lessons easily too.
There is no conflict of interests among the teachers and students. As they communicate effectively using technology, there are no such issues.
The experience levels of both parties get an increase. It has become possible as technology does not replace teachers. The sole aim of technology is to render continuous support. The teachers and the students are getting the supports.
When this is about any complex topic, the teachers are taking help from the internet. In the past days, the matters were not as easy as they are today.
Browsing the internet helps the teacher to know something newer. When s/ he take a class, they try to impart the knowledge. This becomes a participatory process.
The students want to know more, and they again receive the support of the internet.
Consequently, the experience of both parties increases. They know the unknown matters and can apply them in their real life.
So, you cannot ignore that technology has always a negative impact on teaching. At the moment, keep in mind that technology is assisting in the knowledge sharing process.
This is not asking to replace the teachers using its latest invention. This is never possible for technology to do what a teacher does.
Often communication is a personal matter. You need to communicate personally to make it more effective. With effective communication, this is possible to solve various kinds of crises.
You need to know that way of communication. Besides, you also have to add some tools to make it enjoyable. But technology is not able to do that.
In fact, technology will deliver messages. It will not communicate. So, if communication is not adequate, the students will not get the core of the words.
As a result, they will go back in the race. When they do not comprehend the matters, they will cut poor figures.
Therefore, to make the educational communication process lively, the necessity of a human teacher is undeniable. A human being can feel the situation and react accordingly.
But if you expect such matters from a robot, that will be imprudent. This is another reason why technology is unable to replace teachers.
The needs of the teachers will never come to an end. Even, if you want a robot to teach, you will need a teacher (programmer) to guide the robot first.
So, the robot itself is getting a teacher, and that is human.
Attending class with a human teacher is always enjoyable. The students gather a wide range of memories. Every one of us has some sort of memories in our school.
But if it was about a robotic environment, could we get the memories? Think that you are discussing robot teachers. Discussion about robot teacher RX1 said so, or YZ5 told to bring homework – do they sound interesting?
Negative. It brings dullness in the environment. Many of the humans will not adjust with such systems. This is also not feasible in the current context that students will follow robot teachers.
Even more, the students would lose their interests in classes.
The chances are high that they would miss the classes willingly. Since the robots are the results of some program, they will not allow students to be natural. This would be the most potential negative impact of technology.
Teachers are the best gifts in our life. They always play an essential role to make the students educated. The sole aim of the teachers is to share their knowledge and experience with the students.
For the sharing, the students come to know about diversified things in the world. But if there is no teacher, the learning process would be complicated. A robot, software or the technology overall is unable to play the role.
The application of technology makes the learning process more straightforward. Earlier, people used to know through different modes. Getting nearer to those modes was harsh indeed. With the use of technology, we can reach them now easily.
So, undeniably the role of technology is excellent in imparting education. Besides, there is no rivalry between technology and teachers. We need both of them to grow. So yes, technology can’t replace teachers.